Press review: neurofeedback as seen by Santé Magazine

The essentials in 30 seconds

The articleSanté Magazine ran a feature on neurofeedback with input from two specialist doctors: Dr Jean-Arthur Micoulaud-Franchi and Dr Olivier Pallanca.
The principleLearning to modulate your own brain activity through real-time visual or auditory feedback.
Uneven evidenceADHD and epilepsy are the most studied; for other indications, research remains preliminary.
The French positionThe French National Authority for Health (HAS) does not recommend neurofeedback for ADHD (2024) or for autism (2026).

Neurofeedback is attracting growing interest from the mainstream media. In this press review, we summarise an article from Santé Magazine, written by Emmanuelle Blanc with insights from Dr Jean-Arthur Micoulaud-Franchi and Dr Olivier Pallanca. We then look at it in the light of the latest knowledge and recommendations.

What the article covered

The article described neurofeedback as a way of influencing your own brain activity. The brain constantly emits electrical signals whose frequency varies with our state: alpha waves tend to accompany calm, beta waves alertness and concentration. Training involves strengthening or reducing certain frequencies depending on the goal, with one advantage highlighted by the authors: positive reinforcement, as the person sees their progress in real time.

Recordelectrodes placed on the scalp pick up the brain’s signals
Translatethe signals are digitised and linked to a screen or a sound
Actthrough mental effort, the person makes a hot-air balloon move forward or puts a puzzle together
Learnguided by the practitioner, the brain gradually finds the right strategies

The article went on to review several indications: ADHD and drug-resistant epilepsy, followed by areas considered more uncertain (insomnia, autism, depression, post-traumatic stress, Alzheimer’s disease). It noted that the technique, common in the United States, Germany and the Netherlands, remained marginal in France, available in a few university hospitals.

A brief history of neurofeedback

1929: German psychiatrist Hans Berger publishes the first recordings of the human electroencephalogram (EEG).
1960s: first studies showing that people can learn to modulate their brain rhythms, particularly alpha waves.
1972: first publication on sensorimotor rhythm training in a person with epilepsy.
1976: first report in a hyperactive child, opening up decades of research on ADHD.
2014–2025: meta-analyses on ADHD reach mixed conclusions, depending on whether or not assessments are blinded.
2024 and 2026: the HAS does not recommend neurofeedback for either ADHD or autism.

Indication by indication: where does the research stand?

Indication What the article said What we know today
ADHD Many studies report an improvement in inattention and impulsivity. Mixed results. In teachers’ ratings, the meta-analysis co-authored by Dr Micoulaud-Franchi (2014) found an improvement in inattention only. The largest to date (Westwood et al., 2025) finds no overall effect when assessments are blinded. The HAS (2024) does not recommend it.
Drug-resistant epilepsy Fewer seizures in around two thirds of patients. A meta-analysis (Tan et al., 2009) reports fewer seizures in 64 of the 87 patients studied, in small studies. This indication is exclusively a matter for specialist medical teams.
Insomnia Modest progress; a technique still to be refined. In a double-blind study, neurofeedback did no better than sham training (Schabus et al., 2017), and a 2024 meta-analysis shows no additional benefit compared with other approaches.
Autism A possibility yet to be confirmed. The HAS (2026) lists neurofeedback among the interventions not recommended for autism spectrum disorder (ASD), owing to insufficient evidence.
Depression, post-traumatic stress, Alzheimer’s Promising results in a few studies. Areas of preliminary research, with no recommendation to date.
Biofeedback sensors and gels used in sessions
Biofeedback sensors: heart rate, breathing, muscle tension.

Supervised neurofeedback and unvalidated methods

The article warned against certain commercial methods that claim effects on many conditions without solid scientific evidence, and named NeurOptimal as one of them. It also mentioned a consumer smart headset designed to help manage stress. These tools do not offer the same framework as training led by a professional, based on an assessment and with defined goals.

Find out more. We explain the differences between these approaches in our article dynamical neurofeedback or qEEG: what’s the difference?

Our view at Centre Élan

The article’s strength was that it presented neurofeedback with insights from specialist doctors, and distinguished the most studied indications from areas where the evidence is still weak. Its title, however, promised more than research can support today. Our approach is more modest: we offer self-regulation training alongside medical care.

What we offerat the centre

  • A quantitative EEG (qEEG) assessment to describe baseline functioning
  • Personalised training, combined with biofeedback
  • Progress measured by a mid-point assessment
  • Liaison with the professionals who support you

What we do not offerto be fully transparent

  • A diagnosis: that is the doctor’s role
  • Epilepsy care
  • An alternative to prescribed treatment
  • A promise of results or a success rate

For ADHD, you will find details of recent studies in our article ADHD, neuroscience and neurofeedback, and our position on autism in Autism (ASD) and neurofeedback.

Complementary support. Neurofeedback and biofeedback do not replace diagnosis, medical care or therapies such as speech and language therapy. They are used alongside them, in liaison with the professionals who support you. No treatment should be stopped or changed without the advice of the prescribing doctor.

Frequently asked questions

Is neurofeedback recommended by the French National Authority for Health (HAS)?

No. The HAS does not recommend it for ADHD (2024) or for autism spectrum disorder (2026), because the level of evidence is insufficient. It may be considered as a complementary approach, provided this is a fully informed choice.

Can neurofeedback help with epilepsy?

Older studies looked at drug-resistant epilepsy, but this indication is solely a matter for specialist doctors. Centre Élan does not offer training for epilepsy, and no anti-epileptic treatment should be changed without medical advice.

How is this different from a consumer relaxation headset?

A consumer headset offers a standard programme, with no assessment or follow-up. At the centre, training starts with a qEEG assessment and works towards goals agreed with you, and a professional measures and supports your progress.

Sources

FREE GUIDE
Your child’s attention and sleep: the parents’ guide

Get our free guide: 10 practical strategies, drawn from clinical practice and neuroscience research, to improve attention and sleep in children with ADHD, autism or specific learning difficulties.

Then one email a month, no more.

Invalid email address
Newsletter language

Share this article